From 5f59f4b2bb8af485ff4d4c32b3f521b3b6eb60cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Stallman Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:40:15 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] (Floating Constants): Don't say that the various ways of writing 1500.0 are totally equivalent. --- c.texi | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c.texi b/c.texi index 15fa2f3..9f80905 100644 --- a/c.texi +++ b/c.texi @@ -4303,7 +4303,9 @@ the constant's value by ten to the @var{n}th power. Thus, @samp{1500.0}, @samp{15e2}, @samp{15e+2}, @samp{15.0e2}, @samp{1.5e+3}, @samp{.15e4}, and @samp{15000e-1} are six ways of writing a floating-point number whose value is 1500. They are all -equivalent. +equivalent in principle. +@c ??? Are the resulting valus guaranteed to be equal +@c ??? in GCC for the targets that we describe in this manual? Here are more examples with decimal points: