falso
/
c-intro-and-ref
mirror of git://git.savannah.gnu.org/c-intro-and-ref.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typos. 

(Array Params are Ptrs): Renamed from Array Parm Pointer.
This commit is contained in:
Richard Stallman 2024-07-30 10:22:25 -04:00
parent 3c9d0b5db8
commit 9ac6feb5de
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
c.texi
View File

@ -3599,8 +3599,8 @@ too is not really associative. However, the GCC option
order of calculation when an associative operation (associative in order of calculation when an associative operation (associative in
exact mathematics) combines several operands. The option takes effect exact mathematics) combines several operands. The option takes effect
when compiling a module (@pxref{Compilation}). Changing the order when compiling a module (@pxref{Compilation}). Changing the order
of association can enable GCC to optiimize the floating-point of association can enable GCC to optimize the floating-point
ooerations better. operations better.
In all these examples, the four function calls can be done in any In all these examples, the four function calls can be done in any
order. There is no right or wrong about that. order. There is no right or wrong about that.
@ -3684,7 +3684,7 @@ x = x++
@noindent @noindent
@code{x} will certainly be incremented but the incremented value may @code{x} will certainly be incremented but the incremented value may
be replaced with the old value. That's because the incrementation and be replaced with the old value. That's because the incrementation and
the assignment may occur in either oder. If the incrementation of the assignment may occur in either order. If the incrementation of
@code{x} occurs after the assignment to @code{x}, the incremented @code{x} occurs after the assignment to @code{x}, the incremented
value will remain in place. But if the incrementation happens first, value will remain in place. But if the incrementation happens first,
the assignment will put the not-yet-incremented value back into the assignment will put the not-yet-incremented value back into
@ -4948,7 +4948,7 @@ Here's how to determine the number of elements in an array
The expression @code{sizeof arr} gives the size of the array, not The expression @code{sizeof arr} gives the size of the array, not
the size of a pointer to an element. However, if @var{expression} is the size of a pointer to an element. However, if @var{expression} is
a function parameter that was declared as an array, that a function parameter that was declared as an array, that
variable really has a pointer type (@pxref{Array Parm Pointer}), so variable really has a pointer type (@pxref{Array Params are Ptrs}), so
the result is the size of that pointer. the result is the size of that pointer.
@item sizeof (@var{type}) @item sizeof (@var{type})
@ -6622,7 +6622,7 @@ struct record r1, r2;
@end example @end example
@noindent @noindent
structure assigment such as @code{r1 = r2} copies array fields' structure assignment such as @code{r1 = r2} copies array fields'
contents just as it copies all the other fields. contents just as it copies all the other fields.
This is the only way in C that you can operate on the whole contents This is the only way in C that you can operate on the whole contents
@ -10406,12 +10406,12 @@ them. So they cannot be passed as arguments like other values.
a special way. a special way.
@menu @menu
* Array Parm Pointer:: * Array Params are Ptrs::
* Passing Array Args:: * Passing Array Args::
* Array Parm Qualifiers:: * Array Parm Qualifiers::
@end menu @end menu
@node Array Parm Pointer @node Array Params are Ptrs
@subsubsection Array parameters are pointers @subsubsection Array parameters are pointers
Declaring a function parameter variable as an array really gives it a Declaring a function parameter variable as an array really gives it a