dtdocbook: on some systems SIGLOST = SIGPWR and they should not be in the same case statement.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2532f4a5ba
commit
727b47894c
|
|
@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ Tcl_SignalId(sig)
|
|||
#ifdef SIGPROF
|
||||
case SIGPROF: return "SIGPROF";
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if defined(SIGPWR) && (!defined(SIGXFSZ) || (SIGPWR != SIGXFSZ))
|
||||
#if defined(SIGPWR) && (SIGPWR != SIGLOST) && (!defined(SIGXFSZ) || (SIGPWR != SIGXFSZ))
|
||||
case SIGPWR: return "SIGPWR";
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef SIGQUIT
|
||||
|
|
@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ Tcl_SignalMsg(sig)
|
|||
#ifdef SIGPROF
|
||||
case SIGPROF: return "profiling alarm";
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if defined(SIGPWR) && (!defined(SIGXFSZ) || (SIGPWR != SIGXFSZ))
|
||||
#if defined(SIGPWR) && (SIGPWR != SIGLOST) && (!defined(SIGXFSZ) || (SIGPWR != SIGXFSZ))
|
||||
case SIGPWR: return "power-fail restart";
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef SIGQUIT
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue