dma/pl330: Fix misleading type
This type really should just be a regular int as no usages rely on it's 32 bitness (it's only meaningful as a bit position and not a bit mask). This also fixes a printf which uses the variable with a regular %d. Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 2a99d31f377aee371476d9da8fd0d1b7efa30f63.1393372019.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									63a31905cb
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						024c6e2ea5
					
				| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static void pl330_iomem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
 | 
			
		|||
                              uint64_t value, unsigned size)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
    PL330State *s = (PL330State *) opaque;
 | 
			
		||||
    uint32_t i;
 | 
			
		||||
    int i;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
    DB_PRINT("addr: %08x data: %08x\n", (unsigned)offset, (unsigned)value);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue