migration: add has_postcopy savevm handler
Now postcopy-able states are recognized by not NULL save_live_complete_postcopy handler. But when we have several different postcopy-able states, it is not convenient. Ram postcopy may be disabled, while some other postcopy enabled, in this case Ram state should behave as it is not postcopy-able. This patch add separate has_postcopy handler to specify behaviour of savevm state. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									d7788151a0
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						c646762736
					
				| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ typedef struct SaveVMHandlers {
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
    /* This runs both outside and inside the iothread lock.  */
 | 
			
		||||
    bool (*is_active)(void *opaque);
 | 
			
		||||
    bool (*has_postcopy)(void *opaque);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
    /* This runs outside the iothread lock in the migration case, and
 | 
			
		||||
     * within the lock in the savevm case.  The callback had better only
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -2849,11 +2849,17 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
 | 
			
		|||
    return ret;
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
static bool ram_has_postcopy(void *opaque)
 | 
			
		||||
{
 | 
			
		||||
    return migrate_postcopy_ram();
 | 
			
		||||
}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
static SaveVMHandlers savevm_ram_handlers = {
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_setup = ram_save_setup,
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_live_iterate = ram_save_iterate,
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_live_complete_postcopy = ram_save_complete,
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_live_complete_precopy = ram_save_complete,
 | 
			
		||||
    .has_postcopy = ram_has_postcopy,
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_live_pending = ram_save_pending,
 | 
			
		||||
    .load_state = ram_load,
 | 
			
		||||
    .save_cleanup = ram_save_cleanup,
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1008,7 +1008,8 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_iterate(QEMUFile *f, bool postcopy)
 | 
			
		|||
         * call that's already run, it might get confused if we call
 | 
			
		||||
         * iterate afterwards.
 | 
			
		||||
         */
 | 
			
		||||
        if (postcopy && !se->ops->save_live_complete_postcopy) {
 | 
			
		||||
        if (postcopy &&
 | 
			
		||||
            !(se->ops->has_postcopy && se->ops->has_postcopy(se->opaque))) {
 | 
			
		||||
            continue;
 | 
			
		||||
        }
 | 
			
		||||
        if (qemu_file_rate_limit(f)) {
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			@ -1097,7 +1098,8 @@ int qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy(QEMUFile *f, bool iterable_only,
 | 
			
		|||
 | 
			
		||||
    QTAILQ_FOREACH(se, &savevm_state.handlers, entry) {
 | 
			
		||||
        if (!se->ops ||
 | 
			
		||||
            (in_postcopy && se->ops->save_live_complete_postcopy) ||
 | 
			
		||||
            (in_postcopy && se->ops->has_postcopy &&
 | 
			
		||||
             se->ops->has_postcopy(se->opaque)) ||
 | 
			
		||||
            (in_postcopy && !iterable_only) ||
 | 
			
		||||
            !se->ops->save_live_complete_precopy) {
 | 
			
		||||
            continue;
 | 
			
		||||
| 
						 | 
				
			
			
 | 
			
		|||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue